|Turban wearing cavemen were never what the “War on Terror” was about.|
Many have said in the wake of 9/11 that the “War on Terror” was only temporarily reserved for the “Muslim extremists” but would soon include any nationality, religion, or demographic that stood in the way of the globalists’ megalomaniacal designs. As we develop our knowledge of the real world around us, we begin to understand the key to real freedom – self-sufficiency and independence on a personal and local level. Realizing that real freedom also stands in the way of the globalists’ designs, it was only inevitable that any attempt to become independent of their burgeoning world-spanning empire, would “make the list” of terroristic activities as well.
While it is easy to understand a narrative of terrorism that includes bomb-vest wearing foreigners infiltrating our cities and killing people on their way to work, it becomes increasingly difficult to understand as the definition of terrorism is shifted toward you and me. Recently, Zero Hedge reported on the FBI’s conviction of Bernard von NotHaus, an American who was minting his own money. This was not counterfeited US currency, rather it was a private, competing currency backed with precious metals.
The FBI specifically mentioned “terrorism” in relation to Mr. von NotHaus’s case.
‘Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism,’ U.S. Attorney Tompkins said in announcing the verdict. ‘While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country,’ she added. ‘We are determined to meet these threats through infiltration, disruption, and dismantling of organizations which seek to challenge the legitimacy of our democratic form of government.